Tuesday, April 24, 2012

ARE PROGRESSIVES COMMUNISTS in Disguise?

[Across this great country of OURS... THE RIGHT IS RAISING THE HUE'N CRY - Our local paper asked me to respond to an essay that was titled...]
Is Progressivism the New Communism?
R.W. Spisak Jr.

When the schoolyard bully tries to pick a fight, first he tries name calling. Progressives from the beginning supported the overthrow of monarchies, they fought and died for democratic self government. Progressives opposed slavery, and supported women's right to vote. If you think that's a COMMUNIST PLOT, go ask your wife.
Progressive fought to end cozy crony governments and instead worked to professionalize government. One of the first battles modern progressives fought was to establish the direct election of U.S. Senators. Progressives teamed up with Women Rights Advocates and Labor Organizers and together opposed child labor and fought for compulsory free public education for all children. Progressives at the turn of the century were more concerned with citizen participation and access than in a Marxian economic critique. So, no, Progressivism, new or old, has nothing to do with either the theories or the failed practices associated with Communism.


Progressives favor more democracy, more participation for citizens not less. They never concocted rules to make voting harder for citizens. Turn of the century progressives fought to expand and empower citizens. They began a national movement that called for "Initiative, Referendum and Recall." All of which created more not less public input in political decisions. The recall referendum of Wisconsin's Governor Walker would not have been possible without the reforms of the Progressive movement.

 This desire for citizen empowerment is the opposite of the despotic overreach of the tyrant. Fear-mongers resort to the crayon of heated language with their schoolyard taunts since they have no facts. Fifties era charges of “commie” are absurd when the historic record is examined. Today's Occupy Movement is one example of the progressive spirit; the call to end Wall Street's speculative madness is another. Somehow, none of these contemporary Robber Barons have seen an indictment for their massive frauds. Progressivism, still stands against the abuses of the powerful, and shares nothing with the ideology of the tyrant.

Progressives spoke then and now, for the poor, and the factory worker, not the gold-plated billionaire. “Minimum wage”, “weekends” and “vacations” are all the product of progressive principals. All of these were systematically opposed by Conservatives, some of whom are still trying to privatize Social Security. When Upton Sinclair wrote his seminal book “The Jungle” detailing the disgusting conditions in the meat packing industry, the result a public outcry and national food safety regulations. (No doubt dampening the verve of the marketplace.) Sinclair and other “Muckrakers” criticized free range Darwinian Corporatism and Americans demanded regulations. 


Who opposes regulation today and why? If your pregnant wife was given thalidomide by a pharmaceutical company who knew the results would be disastrous, would you prefer they be unencumbered by any responsibilities? Maybe we should complete Reagan's airline deregulation? Lets go totally laissez-faire on airline regulations right? Or are you too squeamish for that. Why should pilots even be licensed? doesn't that impose terrible costs on airlines, they only promised you a seat, not a safe flight right. Who needs mandated maintenance?



Often I find, that people who bemoan the burdens laid upon corporations, seem to have forgotten under what conditions their grandfathers worked. When you take your next pill, would you rather the corporation that manufactured the medicine observed stringent safety guidelines? One man's prudent quality control is another man's brutal governmental regulation.

When we look at the products of progressive reform, from the end of child labor, to a regulated food and drug industry, it is difficult to see any connection between these tremendous achievements of citizen empowerment and the economic theories of Marx and Engels or the genocidal practices of Stalin. 
 for more info contact: PNN

Monday, March 19, 2012

Government so small, you can forcibly insert it into a woman's...

Considering, that most of us, learn compassion, at the feet of our mothers, I can only conclude that the "small government" zealots, were outside tearing wings off flies, while the rest of us learned how to play nice with others.

That these legislators, who loudly proclaim, they want a less invasive government somehow fail to see the hypocrisy, of getting government off our backs and shrinking government down so they can insert it between a woman's legs and even inside her reproductive choices.



 They cannot stop abortions, they can't physically beat women, so they resort to placing economic barriers and delays and the judgement of politicians ahead of the judgement of citizens, who just happen to be women.

What utter lack of respect, for women, for mothers, for sisters and indeed for their own precious daughters. These are not "would-be protectors" these are bullies, who make rules that do not apply to themselves.

Where is the "fair play"? Hold your religion, and cherish it, live it, teach it's values to your children. BUT FREEDOM of RELIGION also means, don't attempt to enforce your religious rules on others who do not believe as you do.

Government so small, you can forcibly insert it into a woman's vagina? That is not the right to freedom of religion. That is simply wrong.

solidarity & peace

www.NewMercuryMedia.com

Friday, March 16, 2012

Are we not Spartacus, Are we not Bradley Manning?

When whistleblowers in this or any country who uncover MISDEEDS are treated as Mr Manning has been treated, by our government (which is us) We must say NO!

The president, a "constitutional scholar" and "Nobel Peace Prize Winner" offered an opinion that his (Bradley Manning's)  treatment was fair, and then without benefit of a trial, suggested that he was guilty - We still have the right to a trial. We must oppose, we must stand in solidarity in opposition to torture in opposition to illegal warfare. 

And while technically you have a point, we are not the starving sleeping in the streets, we are not the homeless, who have been criminalized, we are not the people of compassion who tried to feed them and are also criminalized. 

But, if we don't stand with them. If we fail to understand the power of SOLIDARITY. Then leftist, rightist, republican or democrat alike we will all be subject to totalitarian excess. If we refuse to oppose government misdeeds if we ignore the end of HABEAS CORPUS, then we are all in jeopardy.

The black holes, the torture, the waterboarding, the censorship, the crippling immorality - If we do not stand together and oppose Mr. Mannings treatment, then we are assisting the slide into a New Dark Ages. And woe indeed is anyone who then dares to oppose the REGIME, the OPPRESSION, the EXCESSES. 

And if that's not crystal clear to you, then, I've wasted every letter I've typed and every thought I tried to express. Why were they all Spartacus? These slaves? 
Why why aren't you?

Thursday, March 15, 2012

UNCONSCIONABLE SPIKE IN OIL COMPANY GREED

Sent to REP POSEY (R) Florida - when he asked me about Energy Policy!

Speculation is rampant, the price increases are padding the NON-TAXED bottom line of oil companies, who not only have reaped record profits for decades, with no commitment to either cleaning up the mess that they make and then dump on the poorest of the poor. But, incase you didn't notice, they  have despoiled the Gulf of Mexico and the coast of Alaska. BP by the way got away without cleaning up their act again and again. And in terms of cleaning up and making it right - AIN'T NOBODY HOME!

So when you asked about increasing their taxes - I thought that was a funny statement. I suppose - I should laugh, since the not only pay ZERO TAX, but also get a TAXPAYER FUNDED subsidy? You Like THAT?

How can you even talk about energy policy when you've done NOTHING as a "political leader" to further a nonpolluting source of renewable energy, here in what the TOURIST BROCHURES call the Sunshine State. When will we start putting the SUBSIDIES into renewable energy that we have wasted on petroleum and nuclear power for nearly half a century.

I'm puzzled, if your interested in Energy Policy, or International Security - HOW COULD YOU NOT be an advocate of a wiser energy strategy?

Curious where is your advocacy since we've known since the 1920s that the Oil Industry was just a fad and that eventually, as TE Lawrence warned our grandchildren would be fighting Arabs over control of their lands and resources.

SO besides holding hands with BIG OIL what is your policy for America for the next 50 years?
hmmmm?

I am curious.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

As talk, it was pretty - but you don't build a BRIDGE TO THE FUTURE WITH "Pretty"

Essay with 2 Rebuttals


As talk, it was pretty - but you don't build a BRIDGE TO THE FUTURE WITH "Pretty"


Equal under law, playing by the same rules?  A new cop on the wall street beat?
Maybe we should stop incentivizing OUTSOURCING OF JOBS?


A real Mortgage solution for Mortgage Holders, not just bankers not just a few dozen?
Serious Commitment to Education? A New Fairness in Tax policy?


Since we've seen pretty words before...


I will be waiting for more than the waving of the bloody summary-execution flag.


We dont need to balance a clean environment with full energy development?
Didn't work out so well for the Gulf Coast BP's BFF or those town with FIRE-WATER!


Like ol Ronnie Reagan used to say "Glasnost and Perestroika"... Trust but Verify
(He's one of the President's Role Models)


THEN I RECEIVED THIS EMAIL:


Your negativity is not appreciated & your sarcasm is uncalled for!  
Please remove my name & email from your list b/c I'm not impressed with your 'whine & cheesy talk' anout the eloquent challenge Preident Obama laid before the American people & the hope he engendered to a nation disrupted & bankrupted by GOP greed & glib talk like yours in this email!
Good Bye,
Dan X





SO I REPLIED:



DONE

It's not complaining, to ask if the speech was anything more than just rhetoric.
I don't believe that asking if his ACTIONS will follow his words, is too much. Maybe all you were looking for was an inspirational speech. 

I appreciate a good speech, but I know also know about a Nobel Peace Prize winner, who continues rendition and prosecutes justice with Drone Missiles. Who's prosecuted more whistle-blowers than even the Bush/Cheney team. Who declared that Bradley Manning [BTW detained by the Commander-in-Chief naked in solitary for 10 months] is guilty, without benefit of a trial. (He did say Manning was being treated completely fairly)

A President who has worked to reduce Habeas Rights, and Expand Indefinite Detention. Whose rhetoric on the Economic Crisis has been completely refuted by his actions. (How many occupy protesters have been jailed vs how many criminal banksters)

But nevermind, he at least quoted Elizabeth Warren's comment that no one gets here alone. But he does give a helluva speech. And he's certainly not CRAZY like any of his potential REPULSICAN OPPONENTS.

Support him if you wish, and I will be remain skeptical of any rhetorician who uses his verbiage to collect supporters, and then ignores his own allies needs and his own promises.

solidarity & peace
Rick@AveryVoice.com




Monday, January 23, 2012

MIC CHECK as a tactic? It troubles my heart

Brothers and sisters, let me say this as a concerned colleague. I get the idea of "SPEAKING UP" and being part of the dialogue. But in my heart of hearts, I am concerned that when we speak up to disrupt a speech. We invite the same karma. We damage, dialogue, we "SPIKE" the give and take and prevent speech.



I do not condemn, I was not there. I only raise the question. IF WE DISRUPT do we not give others license to disrupt our speech?

I speak not in condemnation, but only from my honest heart. I want the right to give my speech, free and continuous, I will give my opponent, the respect of hearing their "pitch" as I demand the respect to give mine. By withdrawing that respect, do we not invite the same?


I know full well, they do not respect us, our values or our ideas.


I just think we should set the example of giving the respect that they do not give us, then giving our ideas. Speaking our minds.



I share these thoughts, not in condemnation, and not seeking the validation, of agreement, only to raise a question of tactics.


solidarity & peace


Rick@AveryVoice.com

www.NewMercuryMedia.com

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Long Live Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. the American Ghandi

How curious, how many "conservatives" (right-wing radicals) want to somehow reframe Dr. Kings' support of human dignity (which they opposed and undercut) every way they could, try now to corral the HUMANITARIAN Dr. King into their Mood Ring chant of the moment. Dr. King opposed exploitation.

Remembering Lincoln, as a republican while their standard bearers today, say, Black People need to "learn" about hard work, or ask for Paychecks not Welfare, [because they ignore that there are more unemployed white people on welfare than any other color] Or snort and complain that the todays' President is a Welfare president, when it has been their OUT SOURCING and TRICKLE DOWN VooDoo Economics that caused the loss of good American Jobs. Their corporate off-shoring via TAX POLICY and their gutting of regulations, so their Masters on WALL STREET and K Street who line their gucci loafers and gold trimmed pools with thousand dollar bills.

All that I can stand all that I can expect. The only thing that is over the top, is when some ignorant savage writes in to remember a mercenary assassin, like the refuse that was hired to martyr Dr. King. 

Dr. King uplifter of humanity, cannot be slain, cannot be murdered. cannot be silenced. He will live longer for humanity than any tired mercenary.

Long Live Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. the American Ghandi